Sequence Preloader IconThree orange dots increasing in size from left to right

There's a place for you here.

New to Richmond? Unfamiliar with the Episcopal Church, or with Christianity? Welcome.

Whoever you are, wherever you are in your spiritual journey, the people of St. Stephen's Church hope that your experience with this church will encourage and strengthen you.

As you browse our Web site, you might consider: 

  • visiting St. Stephen's for a worship service 
  • coming to an informal supper
  • stopping by the Farmers Market on Saturday morning
  • attending one of our receptions or lunches for visitors and newcomers (info here
  • signing up for an Inquirers Class
  • subscribing to St. Stephen's weekly email, the eSpirit; there is no cost, no obligation, and we will not share your email address with any outside group
  • attending a retreat, workshop or group, or participating in any of the other offerings you'll see on these pages. 

Do as much or as little as you like. There are no "requirements" for being a part of this community of faith. If you wish to be baptized or confirmed, or to transfer your membership from another Episcopal parish, we'd love for you to do so. But it's not required. Everything we do, everything we offer, is open to all, regardless of whether you are a "member" of this church. If you're here, you belong.

Here's an online visitor card: it's not required--it just helps us to be more responsive to you!

Our Services

St. Stephen's is a vibrant parish that offers worship, prayer and more seven days a week. Sunday, of course, is our big day. You are most welcome at any of the services held here.

Sunday Worship (summer schedule begins May 27)

  • 8:00 a.m., Holy Eucharist: Rite One
  • 9:00 a.m., Holy Eucharist: Rite Two*
  • 11:15 a.m., Holy Eucharist, Rite Two*
  • 5:30 p.m., Celtic Evensong and Communion*
  • 6:30 p.m., Sunday Community Supper
  • 8:00 p.m., Compline
*indicates child care available through age 4

Weekday worship 

  • 8:10 a.m., Morning Prayer with Communion
  • 5:30 p.m., Evening Prayer (on Wednesdays during the academic year, this service includes the Virginia Girls Choir) 

Saturday worship

  • 5:30 p.m., Holy Eucharist: Rite Two


There are several entrances to the church and parish house that are designed to be accessible to those with mobility issues or other physical limitations:

All entrances to the church, and the main entrance to the parish house, are equipped with power-assist doors. In addition, the main entrance to the parish house, from the large parking lot, has an elevator on the ground floor that allows you to bypass the steps. The Grove Avenue entrance to the main church is gently sloped, without steps, and the Three Chopt Road entrance has a ramp

Inside the church, several pews are shortened to allow space for a wheelchair or walker: the first pews on either side of the center aisle, nearest the altar, and the pews near the large baptismal font.

The church is equipped with assistive hearing devices for the hearing-impaired. Please ask an usher for one of these devices as you enter the church.

Nursery - Senior High

St. Stephen's Church has an active ministry for children and youth, staffed by an energetic and talented family ministries staff and dedicated, well-trained volunteers. Michael Sweeney, the director of family ministries, sends a regular email newsletter to parents for which you may sign up.


At St. Stephen's, young people who desire to be confirmed in the Episcopal Church may do so in the ninth grade or later. They are prepared in a year-long course called "Philip's Way," and confirmation takes place when one of our bishops visits St. Stephen's, usually in May.

Are you in your 20-30s?

Young adults are part of every facet of parish life at St. Stephen's, and you are always welcome at any worship service, adult education opportunity or social event—membership is NOT required. You (and your friends and family) are always welcome here. Single or married, with children or not, in school or not--all are welcome.

Get Connected

Some activities and ministries at St. Stephen's are designed especially for young adults, including a young adult Bible study group, social gatherings, retreats, and outreach and volunteer opportunities. The best way to keep up with what young adults are doing at St. Stephen's is to sign up for our e-newsletter.

A Fellowship

One of the distinctive things about being an Episcopalian is the sense of connection and fellowship one has with other Episcopalian Christians. St. Stephen's Episcopal Church is part of the Diocese of Virginia, one of the oldest and largest dioceses in the Episcopal Church.

Our diocese includes 80,000 people who worship God and reach out to others in 181 parishes in 38 counties in central, northern and northwestern Virginia. It is one of three Episcopal dioceses in the Commonwealth of Virginia, the others being the Diocese of Southwestern Virginia (based in Roanoke) and the Diocese of Southern Virginia (based in Norfolk). You can read more about the Diocese of Virginia at


Sunday Schedule

Holy Eucharist: 8:00, 9:00, 11:15

Christian Education for all ages: 10:10 (returning September)


6000 Grove Avenue Richmond, VA 23226

Theology matters

A strong “Statement of Unity” is being issued by faith leaders in Richmond on Monday, denouncing racism, nationalism, and white supremacy.  It originated in the conservative, evangelical Christian community, whose leaders signed it and invited representatives of “mainline” Christian churches to join them. By the time I saw it, many people whom I admire and respect, both in the conservative Christian community and in the more progressive churches, had signed on. I told one colleague, the strength of character of some of the signatories was so great that it made me want to sign on myself, just so I could be associated with them. 

I signed the “Statement of Unity.” And I’m grateful to the folks who drew it up. It’s an important sign of unanimity about the dehumanizing forces of racism, nationalism, and white supremacy. 

Some of the implied theology in the statement, however, gave me pause.

For over 32 years as an ordained person in the Episcopal Church, I have joined other progressive theologians in mainline Christian churches, as well as leaders of other religions, in proclaiming an inclusive and embracing theology. My focus has been more the religion OF Jesus, rather than a religion ABOUT Jesus, because I do not believe Jesus had any intention of starting a new religion; he simply lived a religion and spirituality of unconditional love that embraced all human beings. 

But as many of us in the Episcopal Church and elsewhere have proclaimed this inclusive religion of Jesus and its social implications, we have watched as many of our more politically and socially conservative parishioners left our congregations to join more conservative, evangelical Christian churches, where we were denounced as heretics. My “heresy” has been my failure to interpret the Bible in the same literal or inerrant way that they do. 

The problem some leaders in conservative, evangelical churches had with people like me was that we promoted the ordination of women, whereas, based on their interpretation of the Bible, some of their churches did not even allow women to teach Sunday school. Or, in some cases today, their denominational body has softened a bit and now says that local churches can decide whether or not women may hold leadership positions. 

More recently, our affirmation of gay, lesbian, and transgender people has been a problem for some of these churches. Again, I have been labeled as a heretic by some more conservative, evangelical church leaders and lost some more conservative members to their mega-churches.  When the Episcopal Church ordained a partnered gay man as a bishop in 2003, the charges of heresy, based on evangelical interpretations of Scripture, were rampant, and we lost even more members to evangelical churches. It happened again not long ago with our affirmation of marriage equality, though by now, most disaffected Episcopalians had already left to join more conservative, evangelical churches. Still, although many Episcopal churches have seriously declined over these years, others have thrived, as more and more people have come to appreciate a more expansive and embracing theology that, I would argue, is firmly based in Scripture.

Being labeled as a heretic has been frustrating and annoying for me at times, because usually, the people who have labeled my views as heresy have never had a conversation with me.  Nobody likes to be labeled in such a derogatory way, especially when you’ve never met the labeler. But to be honest, I am not bothered by heresy. A heresy is simply a view that runs contrary to the accepted orthodoxy of the day. Often, heresy represents a healthy sort of diversity of opinion that religious people need, because we can be prone to close-mindedness and a herd mentality. Galileo was condemned as a heretic for espousing that the earth revolved around the sun.

So one of the first things I noticed about the “Statement of Unity” was its labeling of white supremacy as a “heresy.” As I say, I’m okay with heresy, but I’m emphatically not okay with white supremacy, which, if I had to label it, I would simply say represents an abomination. And if we need to use a religious label to describe the ideology of white supremacy, I would call it “blasphemy,” because it denigrates and denies the sanctity and divine presence in non-white human beings. Could we say the same about misogyny and homophobia?

Theological labeling was not my only concern about the “Statement of Unity.” I sense we all need help in labeling people less, in favor of getting to know each other personally more. I sense that books like J.D. Vance’s Hillbilly Elegy have become popular in part for this very reason, following the 2016 presidential election. Nevertheless, I was uncomfortably aware of my reaction when I read the statement’s use of “heresy” to describe white supremacists, since the same word has been used to describe me when I have promoted women in leadership, the sanctity of gay and lesbian relationships, and affirmed the innate goodness and sanctity of people who are transgender. But it was other, theological assumptions undergirding the “Statement of Unity” that bothered me even more, assumptions that I simply do not hold and that I sometimes find potentially harmful.

For example, I do not believe that Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection “offers humankind the gift of eternal life,” as the statement says. I believe, rather, that God has given all humankind eternal life from the beginning. The crucifixion and resurrection, I believe, reveal the gift of eternal life that God freely gives to all, whether one is Christian, Jew, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, atheist, or agnostic. I believe God shows no partiality, and those who do not subscribe to certain doctrines are in no way excluded from God’s loving embrace and gift of eternal life.  Believing that God shows partiality to those who give their assent to certain doctrines can depict a capricious God and send religious people down a path that almost always does not end well. 

Similarly, regarding the crucifixion, the atonement theology that seems to dominate some evangelical churches depicts an angry God who is prone to violence and who demands blood sacrifice and satisfaction. As many theologians have pointed out, this very entrenched theology might well be responsible for the bloody mess we are in right now.  If we believe that God is angry, violent, and requires blood sacrifice, and we are made in God’s image, why should we believe that we will be less violent toward each other?

In addition, as the leader of a Christian faith community, whenever possible I want to sign statements of unity like this, that is, statements about our common humanity, with leaders of other faith communities who are non-Christian. When statements like this make it impossible for non-Christians to sign on (unnecessarily in my view), I feel somewhat complicit in deepening the very divisions with which we are grappling now. If members of the mob in Charlottesville were chanting, “Jews will not replace us,” this point seems particularly important right now.

The statement in question also refers to “God’s consummated Kingdom,” saying we expect it to be “a place of rich diversity and cultural expression.” I believe it to be and expect it to be universal. When only certain Christian leaders are able to sign a statement like this, it gives the impression that God’s salvation (i.e. God’s healing and wholeness) and God’s “consummated Kingdom” are limited to Christians. 

The statement is strong about the sins of racism, nationalism, and white supremacy. In the end, some of my colleagues in mainline churches prevailed on me when I expressed my reluctance to sign. They pointed out that the absence of my signature might send the wrong signal, and I decided they were right. This is a time when Christian leaders need to show unanimity, particularly when some of the racist, nationalistic, and white supremacist views are countenanced in some churches. Thus, the rejections and denunciations in the “Statement of Unity” are probably, for many, the statement’s greatest virtue, making it important and even necessary to sign, as a show of unqualified unity against such destructive forces.  I am truly grateful for this.

But I wonder if one of the statement’s greatest weaknesses is that it avoids one of Jesus’ most difficult teachings, which is to love one’s enemies. 

Richmond is facing some important and highly flammable issues, and sorting out how to engage peacefully with people whom we perceive to be our enemies will be vital.  And without a truly expansive theology, it’s easy to get stuck on labeling and denouncing. But I believe that for Christians, a truly expansive theology, one that goes beyond a religion ABOUT Jesus to the more embracing religion OF Jesus, could be key.

Clergy have a special responsibility to denounce dehumanizing forces of racism, nationalism, and white supremacy, and I am indebted to my colleagues in the evangelical church community for their leadership in this way. But theology matters. And if we are not more expansive in our theology so that we are appealing not only to sectarian interpretations of Scripture but to the loving God of all, if we are only putting labels on our enemies and denouncing them, then I fear our enemies will only become more numerous; they will become more firmly entrenched in their positions; they will perpetrate greater horrors; and we clergy will feel a need to issue even more emphatic rejections and denunciations. 

And I’m just not sure where it all ends.


Clergy Against Racism, interfaith group, holds prayer vigil at Third Street Bethel AME Church: Richmond Times-Dispatch // NBC12

Meeting in the Street